Overcoming Path for Resistance to Organizational Change in SMEs’ Digital Transformation

Zhongshan Torch Polytechnic, Zhongshan City Guangdong Province 528400 Jingjing Chen

Abstract: One of the core propositions of SMEs’ digital transformation lies in the adaptive restructuring of organizational systems, and the existence of resistance to organizational change directly affects the advancement efficiency and depth of the transformation process. From the interdisciplinary perspective of organizational behavior and digital management, this paper analyzes the realistic patterns and resistance characteristics of organizational change in SMEs’ digital transformation, systematically deconstructs the multi-level causes of resistance formation, and proposes practical paths to break through resistance from the dimensions of technology adaptation, mechanism optimization and capability upgrading. It provides a theoretical basis and operable practical framework for achieving a smooth organizational transition and efficiency improvement in the digital process.

Keywords: SMEs ; Digital Transformation ; Organizational Adaptation ; Resistance Deconstruction ; Breakthrough Path

Introduction：

The in-depth proliferation of digital technology is reshaping the rules of market competition, and organizational forms and operation modes have undergone essential adjustments. As important carriers of market vitality, SMEs are often trapped in the dilemma of “easy to introduce technology, hard to change organization” due to resource endowments, scale constraints and institutional inertia. Existing research mostly focuses on the transformation experience of large enterprises or the technical application level, lacking systematic and integrated research on the generation logic and breakthrough mechanism of resistance to organizational change based on the specific context of SMEs. Based on this, from the interdisciplinary perspective of “technology-institution-culture”, this paper focuses on the dual characteristics of resource constraints and organizational flexibility of SMEs, deeply explores the concrete manifestations and underlying causes of resistance to organizational change, constructs a resistance-breaking system adapted to the reality of SMEs, and provides a new analytical dimension and operational guidance for transformation practice.

1 Literature Review

1.1 Research on Digital Transformation

Existing research on digital transformation mostly revolves around technology empowerment and model innovation, with large enterprises becoming the research focus by virtue of resource advantages, and relevant achievements concentrating on strategic planning, platform construction and ecological building. Research on SMEs mostly focuses on the technical application level, discussing the adaptability of lightweight solutions such as cloud services and SaaS tools, while paying insufficient attention to the core link of transformation—the systematic restructuring of organizational systems.Some studies mention the necessity of organizational adjustment, but fail to deeply analyze the particularity of change under the characteristics of SMEs such as limited resources, centralized decision-making and solidified culture, and there is an obvious gap in the targeted analysis of resistance.

1.2 Organizational Change Theory

Research on resistance to organizational change has formed a multi-dimensional analytical framework. Classic theories divide resistance into individual and organizational levels, among which individual resistance involves cognitive biases, skill deficiencies, etc., and organizational resistance includes structural rigidity, institutional inertia, solidified interest patterns, etc. Subsequent research has further refined specific types such as structural, policy-oriented and cultural types, emphasizing the dynamic generation and multi-level interweaving characteristics of resistance. However, existing theories are mostly based on traditional organizational contexts, lacking attention to the linkage process of “technology introduction-organizational adaptation-cultural reshaping” of SMEs in the digital economy, and are difficult to explain the synergistic resistance of technology, institutions and cognition in transformation. There is an urgent need to expand theories in combination with the characteristics of SMEs. In view of this, this paper attempts to construct an integrated “technology-institution-culture” analytical framework to systematically analyze the generation logic, concrete manifestations and mechanism of action of resistance to organizational change in SMEs’ digital transformation, accurately respond to the dual characteristics of coexisting resource constraints and organizational flexibility of SMEs, and make up for the deficiency of traditional analytical frameworks in adaptability to SMEs in the digital economy context.

2 Current Situation and Types of Resistance to Organizational Change in SMEs’ Digital Transformation

2.1 Technology-Organization Adaptation Resistance: The Restriction of Structural Rigidity and Technical Needs Mismatch

SMEs’ digital transformation mostly starts with the introduction of a single technical tool, but the existing organizational structures generally show rigid characteristics of bureaucracy and functional segmentation, which form a natural contradiction with the requirements of cross-departmental collaboration and rapid response required by digitalization. Most enterprises have not established flexible organizational units adapted to digital processes, and information barriers between departments have not been broken, leading to the application of technical tools being limited to local links and failing to achieve full-process connection. This imbalance between structure and technology adaptation makes it difficult for digital tools to exert their due effectiveness, which not only restricts the depth of transformation, but also in turn strengthens the organization’s resistance to change, forming a vicious circle.

2.2 Institution-Interest Hidden Resistance: The Restriction of Rule Inertia and Interest Restructuring Conflict

The management systems, decision-making processes and interest distribution models formed by SMEs over a long period constitute hidden obstacles to digital transformation. Existing systems are mostly designed based on traditional business logic and lack support for digital processes. For example, problems such as cumbersome approval processes and ambiguous division of powers and responsibilities directly affect transformation efficiency. For instance, a simple online reimbursement process cannot be implemented because it requires offline signatures from multiple leaders. The more core conflict lies in the restructuring of interest patterns: process optimization brought by digitalization may touch the vested interests of some positions, and the interest binding between the decision-making level and core employees of SMEs is closer, making such resistance often exist in a hidden form, hindering the advancement of change through passive implementation, process internal friction and other forms, and its impact is more far-reaching than explicit resistance.

2.3 Cognition-Culture Execution Resistance: The Restriction of Capability Shortcomings and Value Deviations

Digital transformation puts forward new requirements for employees’ digital skills and cognitive concepts, but SMEs generally lack systematic talent training systems, employees’ digital literacy is uneven, and their acceptance and mastery of new technologies and processes are insufficient, forming obvious execution resistance. At the same time, the empiricist culture and risk aversion tendency accumulated in enterprises for a long time are essentially different from the innovative awareness and trial-and-error spirit required by digitalization. Employees are accustomed to traditional working modes and have resistance to the uncertainty brought by change, and enterprises have not formed a cultural atmosphere adapted to digitalization, which further amplifies the restriction of cognitive biases on transformation, leading to the failure of change to truly take root.

3 Deconstruction of the Causes of Resistance to Organizational Change in SMEs

3.1 Lack of Adaptation Capability under Resource Constraints: Imbalance between Technology Introduction and Organizational Support

The dual constraints of capital and talents faced by SMEs directly lead to insufficient technology-organization adaptation capability. Limited capital makes it difficult for enterprises to support both technology procurement and organizational restructuring at the same time, and they tend to prioritize the introduction of technical tools while ignoring supporting structural adjustments and process optimization, resulting in an unbalanced situation of “emphasizing technology over organization”. Talent shortage makes enterprises lack compound talents who understand both digital technology and business processes, unable to effectively design adapted organizational structures and business processes, leading to the failure of the synergistic effect between technology and organization to play out. This lack of adaptation capability under resource constraints has become the core cause of technology-organization adaptation resistance.

3.2 en Historical Inertia and Change Needs

Once the management systems and interest patterns of SMEs are formed, they will generate strong path dependence, and this inertia is more significant under the condition of limited resources. The decision-making level of enterprises tends to maintain the existing systems and interest patterns to reduce short-term risks, lacking long-term planning and determination for change. At the same time, the power structure within SMEs is relatively centralized, and the opinions of core employees have a greater impact on decision-making, while this group is often the beneficiary of the existing system and holds a negative attitude towards changes that may break the interest balance. Institutional solidification and interest binding reinforce each other, making it difficult for change to break through the existing path dependence and form deep-seated resistance at the institution-interest level.

3.3 Cognitive Biases under Capability Shortcomings: Superposition of Literacy Deficiencies and Cultural Lag

The digital literacy shortcomings of SME employees are rooted in the lack of continuous investment in talent training by enterprises, and this problem forms a closed loop with the small scale and limited resources of enterprises. Due to insufficient skills, employees cannot effectively participate in digital processes, and then generate fear and resistance to change, forming a vicious circle of “insufficient capability-cognitive resistance-inefficient execution”. At the same time, the lag of corporate culture further exacerbates this problem: cognitive resistance solidifies into behavioral path dependence, employees are accustomed to using traditional working modes and refuse to try new processes and methods, and even if they realize the necessity of digitalization, it is difficult to break through due to long-term formed cognitive inertia and behavioral inertia, forming a “cognition-behavior” lock-in effect, and ultimately making organizational change difficult to truly start.

4 Paths to Break Through Resistance to Organizational Change in SMEs

4.1 Building a Flexible Organizational Structure: Resolving the Contradiction between Technology and Organization Adaptation

To address the mismatch between structural rigidity and technical needs, SMEs should abandon the idea of large-scale restructuring and achieve precise adaptation by building “modular + enabling” flexible organizational units. Cross-functional teams can be divided according to digital business processes, clarifying the power and responsibility boundaries and collaboration mechanisms of each team to break information barriers between departments. More importantly, teams should be given sufficient autonomy to allow front-line members to independently respond to needs and optimize processes, stimulating innovation vitality, which echoes the cultural changes required by digitalization. At the same time, establish a dynamic adjustment mechanism to flexibly adjust the composition and functions of organizational units according to the effect of technology application and changes in business needs, ensuring that the organizational structure is always adapted to the digital process. This lightweight structural optimization model not only reduces the cost of change, but also can quickly respond to technical needs, realize the coordinated advancement of technology and organization, and break the vicious circle of adaptation imbalance.

4.2 Establishing an Interest Coordination Mechanism: Breaking Hidden Institutional-Interest Barriers

Breaking through institutional inertia and interest conflicts lies in building a coordination mechanism that balances the interests of all parties; essentially, the mechanism is constructing a “Coalition for Change”,comprising key roles such as entrepreneurs , change agents, business department backbones , and digital technology experts ,which is one of the core elements of successful change. At the institutional level, approval processes should be simplified, a decision-making mechanism adapted to digitalization should be established, and the division of powers and responsibilities at each link should be clarified to provide institutional guarantee for transformation. At the interest distribution level, it is necessary to design an incentive system linked to digital performance, directly associating transformation effectiveness with employee compensation and promotion, so that core employees can benefit from change and transform into promoters of change. At the same time, establish smooth communication and feedback channels to timely respond to employees’ interest demands and resolve potential conflicts. Through institutional optimization and interest coordination, hidden resistance is transformed into motivation for change. The establishment of a “Coalition for Change” can gather consensus from all parties, reduce process internal friction and passive implementation, and clear deep-seated obstacles for transformation.

4.3 Creating a Hierarchical Capability Upgrading System: Reshaping the Cognitive-Cultural Foundation

In response to cognitive biases and capability shortcomings, SMEs should build a hierarchical and classified capability upgrading system that takes into account the needs of employees in different positions and levels. For grass-roots employees, focus on practical training of digital skills and carry out targeted drills combined with specific business scenarios to quickly improve practical capabilities; for middle-level managers, focus on cultivating digital management thinking and cross-departmental collaboration capabilities to enable them to promote process optimization; for the decision-making level, strengthen digital strategic cognition and improve the ability to control the direction of transformation. At the same time, gradually cultivate an innovative culture and trial-and-error atmosphere by setting digital benchmarks and encouraging innovative practices,with a focus on fostering Psychological Safety—establishing a fault-tolerant mechanism that avoids excessive blame for well-intentioned trial-and-error, so that employees feel secure to break traditional norms and explore new digital processes.integrate digital concepts into the core values of enterprises, fundamentally change employees’ cognition, and lay a cultural foundation for organizational change. This linkage of “breaking” and “establishing” not only makes up for employees’ capability shortcomings, but also resolves cognitive biases, integrates digital concepts into core values, and promotes the true implementation of change.

Conclusion：

Based on the “technology-institution-culture” analytical framework, this paper systematically explores the types, causes and breakthrough paths of resistance to organizational change in SMEs’ digital transformation. Theoretically, this research makes contributions in three aspects: first, it places organizational change theory in the context of the digital economy and expands its explanatory boundary; second, it reveals the complex configuration of resistance to organizational change in SMEs that interweaves and reinforces each other in the three dimensions of technology, institution and culture; third, it constructs an integrated analytical framework applicable to resource-constrained organizations.

At the practical level, the paths proposed in this paper, such as building flexible organizations, interest coordination mechanisms and hierarchical capability upgrading systems, provide operable practical schemes for SME managers; for policymakers, targeted support policies can be introduced based on the research conclusions, such as building digital talent training platforms and providing guidance on flexible organizational transformation, to help SMEs break through change difficulties; for enterprise owners, it is necessary to strengthen the strategic awareness of organizational change and balance short-term costs and long-term benefits.This research still has certain limitations: it mainly constructs the analytical framework based on theoretical deduction, without verifying the effectiveness of the paths through empirical tests. Future research can adopt methods such as multi-case studies and questionnaires to conduct empirical analysis on SMEs in different industries and development stages, further verify and optimize the resistance-breaking paths; at the same time, adopt Action Research to cooperate deeply with one or several SMEs, apply and verify the paths in practice, and deeply explore the dynamic linkage mechanism between organizational change and technology application in digital transformation, so as to provide more accurate theoretical support and practical guidance for SMEs.

References：

【1】Vial G . Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda[J].Journal of Strategic Information Systems,2019,28(2):118-144.DOI:10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.

【2】Ford D J ,Ford W L ,D’Amelio A . Resistance to Change: The Rest of the Story[J].The Academy of Management Review,2008,33(2):362-377.

【3】P.Kotter J . Leading Change Why Transformation Efforts Fail[J].Harvard Business Review,2007,85(26):96-103.